Malakhov's dismissal. Why Malakhov left Channel One and Let them say: Andrei Malakhov’s departure is still being discussed on social networks
Finally, all the i's are dotted - Andrei Malakhov officially left Channel One. “I was always subordinate. A human soldier, following orders. But I wanted independence. I looked at my colleagues: they became producers of their programs, they began to make decisions themselves. And suddenly the understanding came: life goes on, and you need to grow, get out of the tight confines.” , Malakhov explained in an interview with Woman`s Day.
ON THIS TOPIC
And in his address to the country’s chief television doctor, Elena Malysheva, published in StarHit, he was a little more specific: “We need to develop, you, as the producer of your own program, understand this better than others. And if at the same time I pushed you to new topic broadcast called “The first manifestations of male menopause” is also not bad.”
Now for people far from the television kitchen, it’s worth explaining what Malakhov meant. The fact is that Natalya Nikonova returned to Channel One as a producer. She returned and developed vigorous activity, seizing the reins of the “Let Them Talk” program. Employees of Channel One reported that Nikonova’s task is to “shake up the socio-political block of broadcasts.” These changes were not to the liking of the star TV presenter.
The changes, it must be said, were revolutionary. Firstly, Andrei, as they say, was deprived of the opportunity to formulate the editorial plan of the Let Them Talk program. He was assigned only the role of a presenter, to whom questions are written to the heroes and into whose ear monitor the director gives the commands “Let them fight,” “Don’t approach the heroine, let her scream,” “Approach the experts in the hall.” Malakhov function " talking head"wasn't satisfying at all.
The second change concerns the subject matter of his program. If “Let Them Talk” previously touched on the social and everyday sphere, Nikonova decided to make the program a political talk show, which would talk about America, Syria, Ukraine and other news-producing countries. The new format has already been tested - the first episode of “Let Them Talk” with a new host was dedicated to Mikheil Saakashvili. Malakhov, of course, is not at all interested in politics.
Finally, competitors from “Russia” are said to have offered Andrey almost twice as much salary. And “the best presenter in the country,” as Malakhov was introduced to the team, “ Live broadcast", he really needs money now for diapers, rattles and strollers - at the end of the year he will become a dad.
Conversations about the departure of TV presenter Andrei Malakhov from Channel One actually proved one thing: television as a determining factor public opinion, it’s too early to discount it. A simple replacement of a popular presenter, his transition from one channel to another can cause something close to panic in society and the media. What happened, why did Andrei Malakhov suddenly decide to leave Channel One? There are so many rumors and speculations about this matter that we decided to look into it.
I do not rule out that the “trigger” of Andrei Malakhov’s conflict with management was some careless word, a hint, or simply a tough conversation. This happens in a creative team. Colleagues from the “Let Them Talk” team with whom I had the opportunity to talk confirm: “Yes, there is a conflict. But the details are known only “at the top.” Perhaps they want to lure Andrey with money to another channel or there is a human factor at work. There are only two options. Either everything is resolved peacefully and Malakhov remains, or he switches to another channel - most likely to “Russia”. Several people from his team, who once started the “Big Laundry” with him, have already moved there.
The new producer put an end to Malakhov’s plans
It all started with the fact that Konstantin Ernst appointed a new producer of the talk show “Let Them Talk” - Natalya Nikonova. Nikonova is a famous person on TV. Twice winner of the national TEFI award, founder of the programs “Let them talk”, “Lolita without complexes”, “Malakhov+”, “Judge for yourself”. In general, a kind of “godmother” show for Russian housewives. IN Lately she produced the show “Live” with Boris Korchevnikov on “Russia-1”. However, sources at VGTRK confidentially reported that Nikonova may have left “by pike command» after financial verification. The violations were allegedly discovered by Alexander Mitroshenkov, president of the Transcontinental Media Company, which includes New company– producer of “Live Broadcast”. Allegedly, Nikonova for a long time accrued the salary of her protégé, Dmitry Shepelev, who actually did not go on air. If so, what serious ideas could Nikonova offer to the leadership of First in order to be taken to a leadership position after such a scandal?
It is no secret that Malakhov for a long time asked Ernst for the opportunity to produce his own programs. Indeed, at the age of 45, running around the hall with a microphone and cutting your hair “like a boy” is somehow no longer respectable. But Ernst stubbornly did not meet the “face of the channel”, and the arrival of Natalya Nikonova on “First” finally put an end to Malakhov’s plans to produce the program independently. One of the editors of First commented on the situation: “The channel returned to the program the producer who worked there nine years ago, hoping that she would help raise the program’s severely fallen ratings. But Malakhov did not work well with her and demanded the return of his previous colleague. Since the channel did not make concessions for a long time, the presenter began to declare that otherwise he would leave.”
And indeed: back in 2013, the rating of the Malakhov talk show was 9%, it was ahead of the program “Voice”, “Time”, “Let’s Get Married”, “Vesti” and “Ice Age”. However, recently “Let Them Talk” has been heavily criticized for the monotony of topics and some kind of morbid interest in finding out the authenticity of the paternity and motherhood of other people’s children (evil tongues even dubbed “Let Them Talk” a “branch of the DNA laboratory”). Ratings decreased accordingly - for example, in April they were only 6.2%.
Politics for housewives?
On this topic
I have never been to the “Let Them Talk” program, despite the annoying invitations of the editors. The fact is that I know the technology of this project too well. Once there, the unfortunate “invitees” fall into a trap. An accompanying person is required to leave the studio. The invitee, who has undergone “psychological processing” by the editors, is sent to share his misfortune under the camera lenses and can no longer leave the studio. And so that the hero would not find out that his illegitimate children, neighbors and colleagues were called to the show, they were escorted through other entrances. The effect of surprise turned out to be very strong, but not always pleasant and, you see, correct. Now the program will be filmed in a former factory workshop on Liza Chaikina Street. In the so-called “Teledom” there will be fewer “set-ups”. They say that Andrei Malakhov was categorically against moving the studio, and this became one of the reasons for the conflict.
However, there is another reason, which is talked about in whispers on the television sidelines, but is discussed with might and main in in social networks people close to political structures. For example, political scientist Stanislav Belkovsky writes on his Facebook: “It is absolutely obvious that I should host the “Let Them Talk” program instead of Malakhov. In turn, I am ready to give up my places to Andrei Nikolaevich in the Direct Line and Panopticon programs on OTK Dozhd. This is a subtle hint that the show for housewives "Let Them Talk" will now, if rumors are to be believed, give preference to politics. However, according to our information, Andrei Malakhov spoke out categorically against this, using harsh expressions in relation to a person about whom the host of the country’s main channel clearly should not have spoken. But, as you know, “he who lives in a glass house should not throw stones.” This proverb is very popular on TV, where any careless word can cost a person his career. By the way, the fact that “Let Them Talk” is going to be politicized is indirectly confirmed by another fact: Andrei Borisov, the news editor’s “News” presenter, was tried for the role of the new leading project. However, according to reviews, it left a weak impression. As for Malakhov, then, again, according to rumors, his careless words cost him not only his work in “Let Them Talk” - it is even stated that he will supposedly not be on the screen at all.
There are other points of view on the situation. Malakhov’s colleagues, for example, express the version that, they say, the presenter “got starstruck” - 25 years of television fame “blew the roof off.” Maybe. But all these are accompanying circumstances, as well as Andrei Malakhov’s declared desire to go on maternity leave (his wife Natalya Shkuleva is in the last months of pregnancy). Something else is alarming. As it became known, at the same time as darling Malakhov, the handsome Alexander Oleshko, the host of “Minute of Glory” and “Just the Same,” was fired from “First.” No matter how we treated these people, they were the “faces of the channel.” The conclusion suggests itself: “First” is weakening its position against the background of VGTRK. Is this a coincidence? In professional circles, it is not ruled out that the transition to the “second button” of strong personnel is only the beginning of Konstantin Ernst losing ground. Whether VGTRK "First" will be absorbed or not - this issue is now being discussed in the television environment with might and main. On the eve of the elections, as we know, anything is possible.
For several weeks now, the media have been discussing Andrei Malakhov’s departure from the “Let Them Talk” program. Rumors, speculation, assumptions... But the TV presenter himself remained silent, confirming only that he would become a father in November. Now Malakhov has decided to dot all the i’s and in a frank conversation with journalists from one of the publications he spoke about his career plans.
The TV presenter revealed a secret: now he will become an employee of the VGTRK channel “Russia 1” and will host his own program “Andrey Malakhov. Live broadcast”, which he will also produce part-time. As Malakhov stated, he had long ago “outgrown” both “Tonight” and “Let Them Talk,” in addition, he had long dreamed of his own project, his own TV show.
“Even though you have become a popular TV presenter, you still work with the same people who treat you like the son of the regiment. This is a situation where your colleagues came much later, but already have their own projects. And you still have the same old status. You are expected to be the “talk-to-the-ear” presenter, but you already have something to talk about with your viewers. It's like in family life“At first there was love, then it grew into a habit, and at some point it was a marriage of convenience,” Andrey noted.
When it comes to age, it is important to make sure that our choice of clothing, and therefore style, plays into our hands, and in no way emphasizes possible shortcomings, and certainly does not add a couple of dozen extra years.
“I want to grow, to become a producer, a person who makes decisions, including determining what my program should be about. The TV season ended, I decided that I needed to close this door and try myself in a new capacity in a new place,” added the popular showman.
Malakhov did not expand on the conflict with Natalya Nikonova, who returned after a long break to Channel One and who once came up with “Let Them Talk,” noting only that “you have to be consistent in love and dislike.”
It turns out that Malakhov warned the leadership of First about leaving a long time ago, but for a long time they did not believe him. As the TV presenter says, he had a serious conversation with general director channel by Konstantin Ernst, in which they discussed the prospects of the program in the new season.
“This conversation was superimposed on the fact that I was due to have a child in November, and I said that I needed to devote at least a day a week to what I had been dreaming about for a long time. But this whole story is not a conflict with the channel’s management. I have deep respect for Konstantin Lvovich. Moreover, he understands what a blessing it is to become a father and that there is life beyond the daily struggle for ratings,” the TV presenter concluded.
TV presenter Andrei Malakhov told only a year later why he left Channel One. The journalist confirmed some of the theories that began to appear back in July last year.
Last year, news appeared about Andrei Malakhov’s departure from Channel One. Since July 2017, many versions have been built about the departure (or dismissal) of the journalist. Only now it became clear why Malakhov was kicked out of Channel One. The TV presenter himself told about everything.
The journalist didn’t really want to talk to his colleagues from the Dozhd TV channel about this topic. A lot has changed over the year. Malakhov changed the channel, launched his own (and successful) project on YouTube and seemed to have forgotten about Channel One. But colleagues asked the TV presenter to remember the past.
Malakhov confirmed that the reason for his departure from Channel One lies in disagreements. The TV presenter, according to him, was laying “golden eggs” for the company and did not ask for anything. The journalist only wanted proper treatment. Apparently, Malakhov did not get what he wanted, which was the reason for leaving Channel One. The TV presenter did not specify whether he himself left his previous place of work or was kicked out.
Malakhov considers his successor a talented journalist. According to the TV presenter, Dmitry Borisov should have become a superstar over the past year. Nevertheless, the journalist prefers not to meet with his colleague. Malakhov does not watch episodes of the “Let Them Talk” program with the participation of Borisov.
Versions about why Malakhov was kicked out of Channel One
In July last year, different versions began to appear about why Malakhov was kicked out of Channel One. The main reason The media called the journalist’s disagreement with the new producer of the “Let Them Talk” program Natalya Nikonova. The TV presenter wanted to take maternity leave because his wife was pregnant at the time. However, the management gave Malakhov a choice - either a maternity leave or a channel.
There is another version why the journalist left Channel One. This version is also connected with Nikonova. The media learned that Malakhova’s new leader wanted to dilute his program with socio-political topics. There were many disagreements in working matters between Nikonova and Malakhov, which is why the latter had to leave.
Exclusive: why Ernst threw Maslyakov out of Channel One after Malakhov, what does the accusation of corruption have to do with it, and where to buy the sensational remedy for treating joints.
Let us remember that a scandal recently erupted around the dismissal of Malakhov. Ernst simply removed him from Channel One because he mentioned medical corruption in the episode. The episode, which never aired, was about how doctors cripple people with diseased joints, hiding the truth from them! And about the drug from the Research Institute of Rheumatology named after. V.A. Nasonova, which can save millions of lives, while being distributed at a symbolic price!
Before the noise had time to subside, a scandal broke out new round: The media became aware of Maslyakov’s dismissal from Channel One. It is not surprising that the roots of Maslyakov’s dismissal also stem from the story of the pharmacy mafia and joint remedy. Our independent correspondents met with Maslyakov to find out what exactly happened on Channel One.
Correspondent: “Alexander Vasilyevich, could you remind our readers of the story of Andrei Malakhov’s dismissal? What happened on your first channel?”
: I'll tell you how it happened. Just make sure you don't fall off your chair.
Andrey made a program about disabled people who suffered from diseased joints because they were treated with expensive but ineffective means. Andrey told the world about the existence of an affordable remedy that treats arthritis, arthrosis, rheumatism and other diseases ONCE and FOR ALL.
Ernst was furious that Andrei did not agree with him on the topic of the program. As punishment, Kostya not only did not air the program, he fired Andrei, throwing him out into the street like a puppy.
They tried to “silence” this story on Channel One, but thanks to Andrei’s supporters, the truth broke through on the Internet and spread throughout it. I myself did not previously know the reason for Andrei’s dismissal, I read it on the Internet, and then met Andrei in person, and he confirmed all this.
Then I realized the scale of the corruption of the first channel! Previously, I did not pay attention to the fact that even in our humorous program they make adjustments to the text about pharmacies and doctors. Now the terrible truth has been revealed to me.
Channel One is COMPLETELY corrupted by the pharmacy mafia, which profits from Russian pensioners. They advertise on the first channel for remedies for joint pain, which are expensive, but in the end they only bring temporary relief and do not cure! And the worst thing is that our doctors know that a remedy from a NEW GENERATION has already been invented and tested, which really HELPS SICK JOINTS. But no one listens to them, advertising for the product is not broadcast, and the product itself is on the shelves of pharmacies!
Correspondent: “Alexander Vasilyevich, is your departure also connected with this story?”
: Not just connected, this story was the reason. I didn’t leave the first channel, I was “left” from there, as they say. Fired.
After a conversation with Andrei Malakhov, I was terribly indignant at this situation, and tried to push into the new issue of KVN several very caustic jokes about pharmaceutical products for joints, which the first channel advertises with all its might. So to speak, so that people at least think a little about who they believe and what they accept.
But they didn’t let me do this “sabotage.” Ernst immediately summoned me to his place and forced me to write a statement “of my own free will.”
He said that neither I nor Andrey understand what business means, and there is no place for people like that on Channel One. And the fact that in the country everyone after 40 begins to experience pain in the lower back, arms, legs, swelling, cramps, people suffer, it’s hard for them to walk and bend over - this doesn’t bother him. It is necessary to keep the channel afloat and pay employees salaries, and the main income of the channel is precisely the advertising of pharmaceutical, useless joint products.
Correspondent: “But judging by the loud headlines in the newspapers, the story didn’t end there?”
: Do you mean accusing me of corruption? Yes, this is really happening. Two days after my dismissal, I received a summons from the investigator, which stated that charges of corruption were being brought against me. This is irony!
Ernst, of course, brought the accusation. The reason was that I spoke out on social networks in support of Andrei Malakhov, and gave a link to an article by rheumatologist Viktor Sedelnikov, who describes a new, REALLY WORKING drug for joints, released by the Research Institute of Rheumatology.
Ernst tried to turn things around so that the Research Institute of Rheumatology gave me a bribe so that I would advertise their medicine. Fortunately, the investigators are not devoid of common sense, and no criminal case was initiated.
Therefore, now I can safely speak out about the arbitrariness of the pharmacy mafia on Channel One, and I ask you to provide part of the interview with rheumatologist Viktor Sedelnikov, cut from that same ill-fated program by Andrei Malakhov.
Viktor Sedelnikov, senior rheumatologist, Research Institute of Rheumatology named after. Nasonova, Moscow:
“In most cases, patients with joint diseases are offered treatment with chondoprotectors and other drugs that, at the most good result can slow down the development of a particular disease, nothing more. In some cases, people are treated with injections or surgery. As a result, the person does not feel pain and believes that everything is fine, while a cancerous tumor may already be growing in the body. And operations on joints very often end in disability or other serious complications. They are indicated only in the most extreme cases.
It is precisely because of the low effectiveness of the classical approach to treatment that the minds of specialists have always been occupied with the development of a drug that can truly treat diseased joints and restore people to health. At the V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, we have created the first medicine of its kind that can truly restore joints.
The fact is that the Research Institute of Rheumatology is not engaged in commercial activities. The research institute distributes it for a purely symbolic price, as part of a special program.
“ARTRAID cream” is a unique drug that so far has no analogues both abroad and in Russia.
On this moment"ARTRAID" has undergone clinical trials and has shown extremely high rates of effectiveness. It helps even in advanced and severe cases, restoring cartilage tissue and returning joints to a healthy state. The medicine is unique in its characteristics. No other drug can effectively restore diseased joints, returning a person to a completely healthy state.
For clarity, we at the Research Institute of Rheumatology have compiled a table comparing ARTRAID cream with popular pharmaceutical products for joints.
ARTRAID™ | Famous gels and tablets for joints and back | |
---|---|---|
Target: | return the joints to a healthy state ( permanent solution to the problem) | Temporary pain relief, masking the disease ( the buyer needs them constantly) |
Price: | only 990 rubles for a promotion from the manufacturer | 1225-9325 rub/month |
Action: | Eliminates pain, swelling and inflammation Stops the destruction process Restores damaged cartilage bone surface |
Gels: temporary anesthetic effect on the area of application Tablets: temporary pain relief |
Additional effects: | º Protects joints º cartilage tissue of the musculoskeletal system º Increases joint mobility, increases permissible physical activity |
Negative effect: hide the course of the disease |
Side effects, harm to the body, contraindications | None | º Disorders of the digestive system, central nervous system, circulatory system. Impaired functioning of the kidneys, liver and intestinal tract. Allergic reactions may occur |
Principle of operation: | They relieve pain by stopping inflammation and stopping the progression of the disease. Restore cartilage tissue and bone surface, protect joints | Temporarily relieves pain due to the content of anesthetic substances in the composition |
Place in the sales ranking in Europe for the 4th quarter of 2016: | 1 (+53) | not available on the market |
Guarantee: | In Russia there is a 365 day (1 year) warranty from the manufacturer: declared result or refund | Absent |
The fact is that the Research Institute of Rheumatology is not engaged in commercial activities. The research institute distributes it for a purely symbolic price, as part of a special program. Despite my high position, I have no influence on commercial pharmacy chains. All I can do is recommend the drug. I wholeheartedly recommend ARTRAID to everyone. Actually, the entire scientific community understands what a colossal breakthrough has been made in the field of joint treatment. To my deep regret, pharmacy chains did not react, so ARTRAID never appeared on pharmacy shelves. I think the secret is that it is more profitable for pharmacies to sell temporary relief rather than a panacea.”
What should people do if pharmacies do not sell the drug?
We found a way out of the situation - the research institute’s specialists created a special website on their own where you can leave an application for “ARTRAID”. All you need to do is simply leave your name and contact information. After this, you will be contacted to confirm a convenient delivery time. We tried to make everything as simple as possible so that everyone could get their medicine, even if they had never ordered anything online before.
: I think the question is settled. Pharmacies offer outdated and dangerous drugs, while hiding from people the truth about a new drug that is distributed at the expense of the budget. Draw your own conclusions. This is your health and only you are responsible for it. Goodbye!
- What documents should an individual entrepreneur have?
- Accounting for individual entrepreneurs - rules and features of independent reporting under different tax regimes Primary documentation for individual entrepreneurs
- Accounting for individual entrepreneurs: features of accounting in individual entrepreneurs?
- How to privatize an apartment, everything about privatization List of documents for privatization of an apartment